Glen Green has been prohibited for six years from 24 March 2026. The case relates to Innovative Roofing Limited, which has been removed. The Companies Office summary refers to governance and financial management shortcomings, along with creditor losses.
Marcus Raymond Kennerley has been prohibited for six years from 12 March 2026. The case relates to Scaffold Alchemy Limited, which is in liquidation. The Companies Office says the business traded while under financial distress and Inland Revenue was left unpaid.
Amandeep Singh has been prohibited for six years from 26 March 2026. The case relates to Gill Brothers Enterprises Limited, which has been removed. The company operated in labour supply for horticulture, and the advisory says liquidation followed Inland Revenue action over unpaid obligations.
Joel Harry Wiki has received the longest prohibition on the list, eight years from 30 March 2026. The case relates to Eminence Tiling Limited, which has been removed. The Companies Office says the liquidation was initiated by Inland Revenue and there were no creditor distributions.
Why Director Bans Matter
For many people, company failure sounds like a private business issue. But when a company collapses, the impact often spreads far beyond the directors and shareholders.
Creditors may be left unpaid. Workers may lose wages or entitlements. Small suppliers may never recover money owed. Inland Revenue losses affect public revenue. Customers may be left with unfinished work or no practical remedy.
This is why director conduct matters.
A limited liability company gives business owners protection, but that protection comes with responsibilities. Directors are expected to keep proper oversight of company finances, avoid reckless trading, meet tax obligations, and make decisions in the best interests of the company.
When those standards are not met, especially where failed companies leave losses behind, the Registrar has powers to step in.
How The Length Of A Ban Is Decided
The Companies Office says the length of a prohibition is determined by the Registrar after considering the circumstances of each case. Factors may include the nature and extent of the mismanagement, any pattern of non-compliance, and the person’s overall conduct in relation to the failed company or companies.
That distinction is important. Not every failed business leads to a director ban. Businesses can fail for many reasons, including market conditions, rising costs, poor demand, or unexpected disruption.
A prohibition under section 385 is different. It indicates that the Registrar was satisfied that management conduct contributed to the failure, and that public protection required a formal ban.
Construction Sector Under The Spotlight
The latest list is notable because three of the four cases involve construction-related businesses: roofing, scaffolding, and tiling.
Construction is a high-risk sector for company failures because projects often rely on tight cash flow, subcontractors, progress payments, material costs, and tax compliance. When management discipline slips, the damage can spread quickly through the supply chain.
Small subcontractors are often the most vulnerable. They may continue supplying labour or materials while a company is already under financial stress, only to discover later that they will receive little or nothing from liquidation.
This is where transparency matters. Public access to director prohibition information allows businesses, suppliers, lenders, and customers to make more informed decisions before entering into commercial relationships.
A Reminder For Business Owners
For directors, the message is clear: a company is not just a trading name, a GST number, and a bank account. It is a legal structure with serious obligations.
Directors need to know whether the company can meet its debts when they fall due. They need to understand tax obligations. They need to keep records. They need to act early when a business is under pressure.
Waiting too long can turn a business problem into a governance problem.
The Companies Office, which is part of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, says its business registries function is designed to help businesses operate easily, ensure transparency, and prevent the abuse of corporate structures.
Webfit News Perspective
This is not just a technical notice for accountants and insolvency specialists. It is a public interest issue.
New Zealand encourages entrepreneurship, and rightly so. People should be able to start businesses, take risks, employ staff, and contribute to the economy. But business confidence depends on trust. Suppliers need confidence that directors will act responsibly. Workers need confidence that obligations will be met. Customers need confidence that the company behind a service is being managed properly.
Director prohibitions are one way the system draws a line. They tell the public that limited liability is not a free pass for poor management.
The real lesson is simple: business failure can happen, but mismanagement has consequences.
References
Source: Companies Office / Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment media advisory, 25 May 2026.
Companies Register: Search for banned directors.
