By Webfit News
New Zealand Reviews Investor Visa Rules Amid Concerns Over Idle Capital – WebfitNews
There are some positions in rugby where debate never really ends.
The All Blacks No.6 jersey has quietly returned to that category.

By Webfit News
There are some positions in rugby where debate never really ends.
The All Blacks No.6 jersey has quietly returned to that category.
After a brief period of stability under Shannon Frizell, the position has once again become unsettled. Now, with Dave Rennie stepping into the role in 2026, the question is no longer about options. It is about clarity.
New Zealand does not lack talent at blindside flanker. What it lacks is a decision.
timeline
title All Blacks No.6 selections since the 2023 World Cup
2023 : Frizell leaves New Zealand after the World Cup
2024 : July - Finau starts against England twice
: July - Jacobson starts against Fiji
: August to September - Blackadder starts against Argentina twice and South Africa in Johannesburg
: September to November - Sititi starts in Cape Town, both Wallabies tests, England, Ireland and Italy
: October to November - Finau returns as starter against Japan and France
2025 : July - Vaa'i starts the first two France tests
: July - Finau starts the Hamilton decider
: August - Vaa'i starts both Argentina tests
: September to November - Parker starts against South Africa twice, Australia twice, Ireland, England and Wales
: November - Sititi is recalled to start against Scotland
Frizell’s departure after the 2023 World Cup created a gap that has not been properly filled.
Over the 2024 and 2025 seasons, the All Blacks used multiple players at No.6 across 27 Tests. That is not rotation. That is uncertainty.
The modern blindside role has evolved. It is no longer just about tackling hard and cleaning rucks. The best teams now expect their No.6 to bring:
New Zealand has tried to tick all those boxes. The problem is, each player ticks some, not all.
Sititi has shown something the others have not consistently delivered.
Impact.
His performances in key matches proved he can shift momentum, not just maintain it. He carries strongly, defends aggressively, and has the ability to break a game open.
The concern is not talent. It is continuity. Injuries have interrupted his rhythm.
Still, when he plays well, the difference is visible.
Across the 2024 and 2025 Test seasons, the All Blacks rotated heavily at blindside flanker. The numbers show how unsettled the role has been:
| Player | No.6 Starts (2024–25) | Latest Cap Marker | Lineout and Ball Profile | Injury / Availability Note | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallace Sititi | 7 | 18 | Secondary jumper, explosive carrier, strong defensive range | Missed 2025 France series due to ankle surgery | Best all-round upside, most damaging athlete |
| Simon Parker | 7 | 8 (debut season) | Genuine lineout option, 1.97m/119kg frame, carries both edge and middle | Late ankle setback delayed 2025 progress | Closest to a specialist modern No.6 |
| Tupou Vaa’i | 4 | 45 | Strong aerial option, adds maul and set-piece strength | Injury in Hamilton, later knee issue | Effective hybrid, but still a lock playing six |
| Samipeni Finau | 5 | 11 | Physical tackler, direct runner, limited lineout value | Absence late 2025 due to family reasons | Early frontrunner who lost momentum |
| Ethan Blackadder | 3 | 15 | High work rate, strong defensively, limited aerial presence | Hamstring and calf injuries disrupted season | Raises team floor when fit, but availability remains an issue |
| Luke Jacobson | 1 | 24 | Intelligent link player, strong support lines, covers No.8 | Multiple injuries including hamstring, thumb and concussion | Missed the 2025 France series due to ankle surgery |
If you are building a modern blindside from scratch, it probably looks like Simon Parker.
He brings:
Coaches value predictability, especially in tight contests. Parker offers that structure. He may not be as explosive as Sititi, but he makes the team more balanced.
Vaa’i solves one problem and creates another.
He adds:
But he is still, fundamentally, a lock playing as a flanker. That trade-off matters.
You gain lineout strength, but risk losing mobility in open play.
All three are useful. None have made the position their own.
That is the reality.
Depth is usually a strength.
But in this case, it has become a problem.
Over two seasons, the All Blacks experimented with combinations depending on opposition and conditions. That flexibility sounds smart, but it has led to a lack of identity in the back row.
At some point, “different” has to become “better.”
That moment is now.
Dave Rennie does not inherit a broken system. He inherits an unfinished one.
His task is simple in theory, difficult in execution.
He must pick a direction and stay with it.
If Rennie wants attacking impact and game-breaking ability, Sititi is the logical choice.
He offers the highest upside.
If the focus is structure, balance, and set-piece reliability, Parker becomes the safer option.
This approach suits matches where control matters more than flair.
Vaa’i should not be the default choice.
He should be used when the opposition demands extra size and lineout strength.
The decision does not need to be complicated.
Anything less defined risks repeating the same cycle.
This is not just a selection issue. It is a leadership moment.
The All Blacks do not need more experiments at No.6. They need conviction.
For two years, the position has been shaped by options.
Now it needs to be defined by decision.
Because in elite rugby, clarity is often the difference between competing and winning.
The All Blacks have the players.
What they need now is stability.
Rennie’s first real test may not come on the scoreboard. It will come in selection.
And the No.6 jersey is where that decision will be judged first.