Support Webfit News

Independent journalism needs readers behind it. Help us keep Webfit News free, open and community focused.

Friday, 23 October 2026
Webfit News
SearchNewsroom
Webfit News
Search
Election 2026Have your say in the Webfit News reader pollVote in your electorateLive dashboard
News

‘I Don't Want Your Electorate Vote’: Green Candidate Jordan Walker Challenges Voters to Think Beyond Party Politics

In a wide-ranging Webfit News interview, East Cape Green Party candidate Jordan Walker discusses his family's experience of poverty and tragedy, Labour's six years in government...

Part of our coverageNZ Election 2026Polls, policies, candidates and how to vote, all in one place. →
Listen to this articleAudio accessibility
‘I Don't Want Your Electorate Vote’: Green Candidate Jordan Walker Challenges Voters to Think Beyond Party Politics


In a wide-ranging Webfit News interview, East Cape Green Party candidate Jordan Walker discusses his family's experience of poverty and tragedy, Labour's six years in government, National's economic record, wealth taxes, immigration and why young New Zealanders are leaving for Australia.

By Webfit News | New Zealand | 22 October 2026

Green Party candidate Jordan Walker has made an unusual admission ahead of New Zealand's 2026 general election: he is not seeking to become the electorate MP for East Cape.

Instead, the 36-year-old Gisborne-raised candidate wants to use his campaign to highlight social inequality, advocate for his party's policies and encourage voters to consider the Green Party's role in Parliament.

In an exclusive interview with Webfit News, Walker faced questions about whether the Greens could afford their election promises, why voters should trust them over Labour, what National had achieved and whether New Zealand was doing enough to retain its young people.

His answers revealed a candidate deeply influenced by personal tragedy, strongly committed to his party's direction and reluctant to criticise Labour's previous government.

But they also raised questions about political accountability, the affordability of election promises and what meaningful change would look like for struggling New Zealanders.

A Childhood Marked by Poverty and Personal Loss

Walker says his political outlook began long before he joined the Green Party.

Growing up in Gisborne, in Te Tairāwhiti on the East Coast, he was raised alongside three siblings by a single mother receiving a benefit.

He described poverty and inequality as part of his everyday childhood experience.

At the age of 12, Walker experienced a devastating family tragedy when his older brother Josh, then 13, died by suicide.

The loss profoundly shaped his interest in social justice and the circumstances affecting vulnerable young people.

As he grew older, Walker began studying and reading about social issues, particularly those affecting Indigenous communities.

He came to believe that wider systemic problems had contributed to the circumstances surrounding his brother's death.

That remains Walker's personal interpretation of a deeply painful family experience, rather than an independently established explanation of its causes.

The experience, he said, helped direct his interest towards the social sciences and eventually politics.

Walker first stood as an independent in the 2022 local body elections before becoming a Green Party candidate in the 2023 general election.

He also contested a Gisborne District Council election, narrowly missing out on a general seat according to his account.

‘I Don't Want to Be the Electorate MP’

One of the interview's most unexpected moments came when Walker was asked what voters should know about him.

Rather than making a conventional appeal for personal support, he explained that he was not seeking the electorate vote.

"I don't want to be the electorate MP. Not yet," Walker said.

He explained that he wanted to focus on building support for the Green Party while continuing his involvement in community organisations.

Walker said consistency, authenticity and transparency were essential qualities for people seeking public office.

He also argued that elected representatives should demonstrate their commitment to communities before and after holding political positions.

His comments distinguish his personal campaign objectives from those of candidates actively seeking to win an electorate seat.

Under New Zealand's mixed-member proportional electoral system, voters have separate electorate and party votes, with the party vote largely determining each qualifying party's share of seats in Parliament.

Asked Where the Greens Went Wrong, Walker Could Not Name a Mistake

Webfit News challenged Walker to identify an area where the Green Party had made mistakes.

He did not offer a specific example.

"I don't think that the Green Party have gone wrong in any areas," he said.

Instead, Walker argued that the party had successfully expanded its focus beyond environmental protection to address everyday concerns, particularly the cost of living.

He described social justice as his primary political interest and praised the party's approach to economic inequality.

The response left an important question unanswered: how does a candidate evaluate their own party's record when asked to identify something it could have done differently?

Walker maintained that the Greens were responding to the issues New Zealanders were facing.

Why Should Voters Trust the Greens Over Labour?

Asked why voters should place their confidence in the Greens rather than Labour, Walker avoided presenting the two parties as direct rivals.

He said cooperation would be necessary if they were to form a government together.

Walker argued that the Greens were offering more ambitious responses to the cost-of-living crisis and climate change.

"We need to be more ambitious," he said.

"We need to push further to actually meet the needs of the people."

He also said government needed to allocate funding where it would make the greatest difference and listen more closely to the public.

His answer reflected a preference for cooperation between the parties, rather than a detailed comparison of their competing policy proposals.

Labour Had Six Years. What Did It Fail to Deliver?

Webfit News pressed Walker on Labour's six years in government from 2017 to 2023.

Asked to identify what Labour had failed to deliver, Walker began by defending the government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

He described the period as exceptionally difficult and praised the leadership of former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

Walker acknowledged that pandemic mandates had created division, including among people who traditionally supported left-leaning political parties.

He described the resulting hostility as unfortunate.

However, he remained reluctant to identify a specific major policy failure from Labour's time in office.

He argued that New Zealand had performed well internationally in protecting lives during the pandemic.

His assessment was a political opinion expressed during the interview, rather than a comprehensive evaluation of Labour's six-year record.

What Has National Done Right?

The questioning then turned to the National-led government.

Asked to identify one thing National had done well, Walker struggled to provide an example.

He said he would have liked to credit the government with supporting small businesses but believed many were facing serious difficulties.

Walker pointed to business liquidations and concerns he said he had heard while campaigning.

He also acknowledged National's continued support among agricultural and farming voters.

But he did not identify a particular government policy he considered successful.

His comments about business liquidations were not accompanied by a specific dataset or comparison period, so the scale and causes of those difficulties require separate examination.

Are the Greens Too Focused on Climate and Not Enough on Jobs?

Walker rejected the suggestion that the Green Party was prioritising environmental issues at the expense of employment.

He said climate policy remained important, particularly for East Coast communities exposed to severe weather and natural disasters.

However, he argued that the Greens were also focused on wages, training opportunities and economic security.

Among the proposals he discussed were:

  • Making the first $10,000 of personal income tax-free.

  • Increasing the minimum wage in line with inflation.

  • Improving pay for apprentices and trainees.

  • Restoring fees-free tertiary education.

  • Introducing employment measures aimed at creating opportunities for young people.

Walker said New Zealand needed to create conditions that would encourage young people to remain in the country rather than seek opportunities overseas.

He also claimed that close to 100,000 young people were unemployed.

That figure was not independently substantiated in the interview and would require a clearly defined age group and reporting period before being treated as an official unemployment statistic.

Can New Zealand Afford the Greens' Promises?

One of the central questions put to Walker concerned the affordability of the Green Party's proposed policies.

His answer was immediate.

"Yes, they can."

Walker pointed to the party's proposed wealth tax as a way to fund public services and reduce inequality.

He described a 2.5% tax affecting approximately 0.3% of the population, or around 16,000 people.

Those were figures presented by Walker during the interview. The discussion did not establish the full design of the proposed tax, its projected annual revenue or the total cost of the policies it would support.

Walker argued that wealthy New Zealanders should contribute more to funding public services.

"There is wealth in this country. There is money around," he said.

He also argued that income and wealth disparities had become too large.

However, the interview did not include a detailed fiscal breakdown demonstrating whether the proposed revenue would cover the party's spending commitments.

That remains an important issue for voters evaluating the affordability of the Greens' programme.

Would Working Families Pay Less Tax?

Asked whether he supported lower taxes for working families, Walker highlighted the proposal to make the first $10,000 of income tax-free.

He drew on his own experience living in Australia during his twenties, where he said he had benefited from a tax-free income threshold.

Walker presented the proposal as a way to improve disposable income for ordinary New Zealanders.

The wider distributional effects would depend on how the proposal was implemented alongside other tax changes.

Should Immigration Fall When Unemployment Rises?

Walker was also asked whether New Zealand should reduce immigration when unemployment increases.

He said he did not support that approach.

Walker argued that people seeking to build a life in New Zealand, including refugees, should have opportunities to do so while respecting Te Tiriti o Waitangi and local communities.

He also maintained that migrants and wealthy newcomers should contribute fairly through the tax system.

At the same time, he acknowledged that New Zealand needed to do more to create opportunities for people already living here.

His position was that supporting domestic employment and welcoming migrants should not automatically be treated as competing objectives.

When asked whether Labour's 2021 Resident Visa scheme had been the right decision, Walker said he was not sufficiently familiar with it to comment.

"I'm not too sure about that scheme, to be honest," he said.

The admission was one of the interview's clearer examples of the candidate declining to take a position on a policy he did not know enough about.

Why Are Young New Zealanders Leaving for Australia?

Walker offered a more personal response when the conversation turned to migration across the Tasman.

He argued that wages, housing affordability and the cost of living were making it increasingly difficult for young New Zealanders to establish themselves.

"Because there's nothing here for them," he said when asked why young people were leaving.

Walker described his own experience of moving to Adelaide at 21 and remaining in Australia until he was 27.

He said the difference in living standards had been noticeable and that returning to New Zealand was a difficult decision.

Family connections ultimately brought him home.

Walker argued that New Zealand needed to provide better employment, education and housing opportunities if it wanted to retain young people.

The comparison between New Zealand and Australia is complex, with wages, housing costs and employment conditions varying significantly between cities and occupations.

Nevertheless, his account highlighted the personal choices facing young New Zealanders considering their futures.

Rapid Fire: Luxon, Swarbrick and Political Frustration

The interview concluded with a rapid-fire round that offered a glimpse of Walker's political preferences and frustrations.

Asked to describe Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in one word, he replied:

"Disappointing."

Given a choice between debating Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick and Labour leader Chris Hipkins, he chose Swarbrick.

Asked about the biggest misconception surrounding Green Party supporters, Walker said it was the belief that they cared only about the environment.

And when asked to complete the sentence, "New Zealand would be better if politicians stopped…", his answer was:

"Making decisions about things that they don't know about."

It was a response consistent with his wider argument that political decision-making should be informed by lived experience and community needs.

The Question That Remains

Throughout the interview, Walker repeatedly returned to inequality, community wellbeing and the importance of protecting vulnerable people.

His personal experiences help explain why those issues matter to him.

But the conversation also exposed areas where his answers were less specific.

He did not identify a clear mistake made by the Green Party, remained reluctant to criticise Labour's six years in government and offered no detailed fiscal calculations to support his confidence in the affordability of the Greens' programme.

Those omissions matter because election campaigns require more than statements of values.

Voters also need to understand how policies would be funded, implemented and measured.

Walker ended the interview by reiterating that he was seeking support for his party rather than an electorate mandate.

For East Cape voters, the interview provides an opportunity to examine both the convictions driving his campaign and the questions that remain about the policies he supports.

As New Zealand approaches the 2026 election, the challenge for every candidate is the same: turning political commitments into practical, accountable outcomes for the people they hope to represent.


Source: Webfit News exclusive interview with Jordan Walker, Green Party candidate for East Cape, supplied interview transcript.

Reporting note: Policy figures and political assessments attributed to Walker reflect statements made during the interview and are not presented as independently verified statistics.

Election 2026Politics
Related

More on this story

From the newsroom

Keep reading

Back to homepage